Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Opinion | Better retiree benefits can help fix Michigan’s employee shortage

Michigan’s shortage of teachers, public safety officers and other vital public employees threatens to harm the quality of life in communities across the state. This shortage isn’t new. It’s well-documented and has been an issue for years. 

Right now, the State of Michigan has nearly 600 open jobs, with State Police and Corrections particularly desperate for new hires. A 249-page report issued last year by a leading state research firm also found that school districts across the state have been using COVID funds to poach teachers from neighboring areas because they can’t fill open positions. It’s a short-term solution that does nothing to create a sustainable talent pool, and those funds will soon dry up anyway. 

Nick Ciaramitaro headshot
Nick Ciaramitaro is the president of the Coalition for Secure Retirement – Michigan.

Like in the business world, one of the best ways to address public-employee recruitment and retention issues is to ensure that people are treated fairly, with quality pay and benefit packages. And the ace that schools and government used to have up their sleeves to incentivize workers was through pension and retiree health-care benefit packages. Restoring those benefits will go a long way toward recruiting and retaining more teachers for our schools and the employees necessary to provide government services like law enforcement and health care that Michiganders rely on every day.  

Unfortunately, when the state and education systems shut down their pension plans and slashed retiree health-care benefits, they did so under the false premise that whatever the private sector is doing must also be good for the public sector. What we’ve been left with is an entire generation of retirees that are worse off than their predecessors, and with zero benefit to taxpayers. 

As someone who served in the Legislature when pension plans and retiree benefits were slashed in 1997, I can confirm those plans were actually overfunded at that time. Today, because new people have been unable to participate and contribute to the system, it has become an unfunded liability. On top of that, the thousands of people who have been left with the responsibility of funding their own 401(k) programs have found themselves in a retirement savings crisis. Nationally, the average savings for households nearing retirement is just $12,000, which means they will be forced to rely on social security and other government programs that cannot guarantee a comfortable retirement.

Contrary to popular belief, modern pension programs offer significant cost savings for taxpayers. Studies have shown that defined-benefit pension plans cost 27% less to manage and maintain compared to 401(k)-style plans. 

Pension programs have also shown to be better for workers by providing a stable retirement income at a smaller cost to taxpayers and at the same time reducing inequality. Research from the National Institute on Retirement Security found that retired women in Michigan were 79% more likely to be above the federal poverty level if they have a pension income, and Black retirees with a pension were 89% more likely to be above poverty level.  

It should be no surprise then that pensions are making a comeback. Just this year, the Alaska Senate approved legislation to revive a pension program that could bring improved benefits to as many as 37,000 state employees. Under this plan, new employees would join the pension program, and existing employees would be allowed to switch over.

Even the business community is beginning to recognize that pension programs are an asset. Last fall, corporate world bellwether IBM announced it would stop matching 401(k) contributions and instead contribute to employee retirement savings via a defined-benefit pension structure known as a “Retirement Benefit Account.” 

It’s time for Michigan policymakers to follow these hard-learned lessons and take concrete steps to do right by our teachers, public safety workers and other public employees that contribute to the betterment of our communities. The first step should be ensuring that all state employees have access to a pension program and restoring the retiree benefits originally promised to school employees that were taken away in 2012. 

People who are treated well are happier and more productive, so let’s make sure our state and schools are the sort of employers that attract and retain quality workers by ensuring they offer quality benefits to match. 

How impactful was this article for you?

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission. If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact David Zeman. Click here for details and submission guidelines.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now